_savage wrote:...and 5.4.3.2
Your signature tells 5.3.4.2 (at the moment).
attachment wrote:doubletoc.docx
What do you expect of docx? Ok. I had zero or less experience with documents loaded from docx? Why do you think you should use it? Errors and surprises expected. (And even MS software is reported to not be able to open OOXML - strict or "transitional"? - in certain cases. See
https://flosmind.wordpress.com/2017/05/18/libreoffice-can-open-xlsx-files-excel-cannot/ e.g.) In fact your example produces the TOC-doubling effect for me in LibO V5.4.3 and in V6.0.0.0beta1, too,
but not in AOO V4.1.3. Anyway: Why tamper with documents in alien "formats". Different formats can never contain the
same real thing. They are limited to similar appearance and a certain degree of compatibility during work. There is a saying that LibO is "better" in docx than AOO. As you see there are exceptions. Of course phenomena may depend on
which software wrote the file. As I cannot test to reasonable detail with files written by 'MS Office' I will not again comment on issues related to such alien "formats". The
one correctly approved family of open document formats is ODF. To also accept OOXML under the "open" label was a political issue, and a terrible mistake, imo. It mainly is a means to fight free and open software by the well-known commercial "vendor".
On Windows 10: LibreOffice 6.2 and older versions, PortableOpenOffice 4.1.5 and older, StarOffice 5.2
---
Lupp from München