John_Ha wrote:Are AOO and LO installed on the same PC? or on different PCs?
John_Ha wrote:Please post large enough images of both so the difference can be examined
John_Ha wrote:Is it the same if you try a different font?
EDIT: The file won't upload!
Libre vs OO-2.odt
RoryOF wrote:The OpenOffice file uses Arial, the LibreOffice file uses Liberation sans, as far as I can see.
shilliard wrote:I have both LO and OO notes open on screen side by side.
The LO note Tahoma text is biggest on screen but it will be smallest when printed.
The LO picture image at top of the note is smallest (fattest face) on screen but will be biggest (longest face) when printed.
John_Ha wrote:Take a copy of the AOO file and open the file in AOO and the copy in LO. They are both the same. Repeat with LO - they are both the same again.
shilliard wrote:When AOO creates a new presentation it asks if the medium will be print or screen. I don't understand that.
RoryOF wrote:
The OpenOffice file uses Arial, the LibreOffice file uses Liberation sans, as far as I can see.
Zizi64 wrote:Because the Arial font is a Microsoft heritage: It is a commercial font. You can not embed the commercial fonts into the documents if the licence of the commercial font does not allow this for you. Therefore the Developers of the LibreOffice use really free and opensource Fonts for the default properties.
John_Ha wrote:
5. The big difference is when AOO or LO are installed on Linux. Linux does not have any of the Microsoft fonts so only those fonts available in the Linux distribution are available for AOO and LO. For example, Microsoft's Arial is not available on a Linux distribution. Hence neither AOO nor LO will use Arial on Linux and, if a document calls for Arial, Linux will silently substitute the closest available installed font which approximates to Arial.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests