Upgrade signature pattern?

The place for discussions and decisions about the forum

Upgrade signature pattern?

Postby Jan_J » Fri Feb 22, 2013 1:25 pm

Hi,
please consider to upgrade regexp that user's sigantures need to be matched to.
I have obtained an user's complain http://forum.openoffice.org/pl/forum/vi ... 7096#p7096. In fact, signature text "LibreOffice 4.0 na Windows 7 Home Premium" is rejected by the registration engine. Change 4 → 3 allows for registration. There is LibreOffice 4.0 and there's no need to wait until AOO 4.0 is released. People in Poland use LO more intensively than AOO, and our preamble does not exclude users because they use any OO.org derivative other than Apache.
JJ ∙ http://forum.openoffice.org/pl/
LO (6.1|6.0) ∙ AOO 4.1.5 ∙ Python (3.7|2.7) ∙ Unicode 11 ∙ LᴬTeX 2ε ∙ XML ∙ Unix tools ∙ Linux (2.6|3.x) ∙ Fedora ∙ CentOS ∙ SUSE
Jan_J
 
Posts: 142
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 1:42 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Upgrade signature pattern?

Postby FJCC » Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:44 pm

This post makes a good point. Is this something imacat would have to do? Are there any objections to doing it?
Windows 10 and Linux Mint, since 2017
If your question is answered, please go to your first post, select the Edit button, and add [Solved] to the beginning of the title.
FJCC
Moderator
 
Posts: 7153
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2008 8:08 pm
Location: Colorado, USA

Re: Upgrade signature pattern?

Postby Hagar Delest » Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:55 pm

I've PMed her this topic when it has been posted.
Of course, we should fix it.
AOO 4.1.6 on Xubuntu 19.04 and 4.1.5 on Windows 7 (with winPenPack port).
User avatar
Hagar Delest
Moderator
 
Posts: 28471
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 9:07 pm
Location: France

Re: Upgrade signature pattern?

Postby acknak » Sun Feb 24, 2013 9:55 pm

I tried to go back and find out what the actual requirement is but had no luck.

I can't imagine why there was any specific version number check--I don't understand what that would accomplish.

The other side of this is, of course, that the registration info isn't critical to be correct, since it can be changed after the registration is complete. Not nice if users have to do that, but not difficult either.
AOO4/LO5 • Linux • Fedora 23
User avatar
acknak
Moderator
 
Posts: 22756
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:25 am
Location: USA:NJ:E3

Re: Upgrade signature pattern?

Postby Hagar Delest » Sun Feb 24, 2013 10:39 pm

This came from this topic: Captcha (archives in the private section).
The version number was a good strategy to defeat the bots. I agree with that (many spammers copy and paste the full example line, which is nonsense).

So I'm in favor of keeping the current system and update the versions available for registration.
AOO 4.1.6 on Xubuntu 19.04 and 4.1.5 on Windows 7 (with winPenPack port).
User avatar
Hagar Delest
Moderator
 
Posts: 28471
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 9:07 pm
Location: France

Re: Upgrade signature pattern?

Postby acknak » Sun Feb 24, 2013 11:13 pm

Ahh, right. Thanks for looking that up.

What would be the problem with accepting anything other than the verbatim example signature? I still don't see any advantage in looking for a certain version number, or range of versions. If we want to encourage people to include the version information, then just look for any digit and be done with it.

I'm all for having the user enter something as a Turing test, but trying to also extract or enforce correct system/version info seems pointless to me.
AOO4/LO5 • Linux • Fedora 23
User avatar
acknak
Moderator
 
Posts: 22756
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:25 am
Location: USA:NJ:E3

Re: Upgrade signature pattern?

Postby Hagar Delest » Sun Feb 24, 2013 11:25 pm

Since there was almost no issue with that, I suppose we let it live as it is.
We should take the verbatim line as a correct one, it helps to spot the spammers!

As for validating digits, that may be a good solution indeed.
AOO 4.1.6 on Xubuntu 19.04 and 4.1.5 on Windows 7 (with winPenPack port).
User avatar
Hagar Delest
Moderator
 
Posts: 28471
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 9:07 pm
Location: France

Re: Upgrade signature pattern?

Postby Mr.Dandy » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:18 am

3 yrs later, I bump this thread
Unable to set "LibreOffice" in signature when registration process.
capture-1.png

Just "OpenOffice" or... "Microsoft Office" is accepted :shock:
OpenOffice 4.1.3 - Windows 7
User avatar
Mr.Dandy
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:22 pm

Re: Upgrade signature pattern?

Postby RoryOF » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:22 am

Not having registered in a very long time I cannot say about the registration process; however, one can subsequently edit one's .sig to almost anything one likes.
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.6 on Xubuntu 18.04.2 (mostly 64 bit version) and very infrequently on Win2K/XP
User avatar
RoryOF
Moderator
 
Posts: 28912
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:30 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: Upgrade signature pattern?

Postby Mr.Dandy » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:37 am

I know it but very frustrating for new users.
Especially as the forum mentions LibreOffice in the banner.

Why you don't fix it?
OpenOffice 4.1.3 - Windows 7
User avatar
Mr.Dandy
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:22 pm

Re: Upgrade signature pattern?

Postby RoryOF » Thu Jul 28, 2016 10:49 am

As far as I know none of the Administrators or Moderators have access to the underlying php code, nor, I surmise, experience with that even if they had the access.
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.6 on Xubuntu 18.04.2 (mostly 64 bit version) and very infrequently on Win2K/XP
User avatar
RoryOF
Moderator
 
Posts: 28912
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 9:30 pm
Location: Ireland

Re: Upgrade signature pattern?

Postby Hagar Delest » Thu Jul 28, 2016 9:59 pm

Indeed. I've just sent a mail on the dev mailing list to ask for help.
AOO 4.1.6 on Xubuntu 19.04 and 4.1.5 on Windows 7 (with winPenPack port).
User avatar
Hagar Delest
Moderator
 
Posts: 28471
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 9:07 pm
Location: France


Return to Forum Governance

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest