(YES,


A table of blood tests grows over time. Depending on the frequency of tests, a graft of more than the last 10 test becomes meaningless. How can the X-axis be adjusted?
Thank you!
(Calc 5.2.3.3) on (Win - 10)
Roses are Red, Violets are Blue]
Unexpected '{' on line 32
.Thank you!robleyd wrote:See the first answer, second option in How do I append a row to the end of a spreadsheet? and F1 and search references;expanding (Calc) will give you more information on expanding references.
This is a follow-on question: Given that on one date many tests may (or not) be done. It is valid for a test NOT to be done. How may a row be ignored from a chart if a given column holds no data?Zizi64 wrote:Do you want to achieve somethig similar as in the modified example file?
Thank you, Zizi64Zizi64 wrote:You can use a "Space" character ...................
I wish for a table being made with rows with Date and Values only from rows from the original table containing values.
It works, thanks to Zizi64 !!!! No macro needed.Zizi64 wrote: Tips:
A fine catch, Villeroy! In fact rows 21 and 23 dupes, and the only the first date was carried to the net step. I guess that I am not very observant.Villeroy wrote:VLOOKUP does not handle duplicates. Create some dupes in column C. The VLOOKUPs return the same date which is the first matching date..
which I cannot do......Villeroy wrote:This would be very easy to do with a database....
Thank you again!Villeroy wrote:anyway, ...
.....
Now you have a clean list to start with.
The secondary Y axis is shown in your file, but the graph lines are assigned to the primary axis. You must fix it:(notice that Calc plots values higher than they are?)
Thank you! I see that now.Zizi64 wrote:Probably this problem is related to the fact, that the X axis has revert-ordered values, and the position of the secondary axis is adjusted to the END of the X axis. The "END" probably means the largest value on the axis.
But the answer remains the same: A spreadsheet is not a database, no matter how hard you try.FKlusmann wrote:Every question answered seems to bring in two more to be asked........
Though the topic is marked Solved, there seem to be additional questions. Perhaps the attached method will be of interest. It does not use evil macros.FKlusmann wrote:… a [chart] of more than the last 10 test becomes meaningless. How can the X-axis be adjusted?