[Solved] Sub-forums dedicated to [only] tutorials ?

[FBO]

As I'm used to working with the MS versions it's just a case of where to find what MS does on OO.
In those cases I can't find it, it's good to have a place where you can find tutorials and referenceguides of the programs.
As I'm new to programming in OO-Basic, I would like to see a place for tutorials and referenceguides on making macro's and listeners

[Villeroy]

As I'm used to working with the MS versions it's just a case of where to find what MS does on OO.
In those cases I can't find it, it's good to have a place where you can find tutorials and referenceguides of the programs.
As I'm new to programming in OO-Basic, I would like to see a place for tutorials and referenceguides on making macro's and listeners

This is completely out of scope. A user forum can not teach you how to program. There are countless tutorials, books (paper and online), snippet repositories and at least 3 object inspectors. All you have to know is how to program (then you may decide NOT to use this limping dinosaur called "Basic").

[RoryOF]

I would suggest the Tutorials should be made Read-only, so that we get no stray postings; Tutorials should only be postable by an Admin or a Mod.

[DrewJensen]

are you saying that one should have to ask to have a tutorial posted for them?

[r4zoli]

I would suggest the Tutorials should be made Read-only, so that we get no stray postings; Tutorials should only be postable by an Admin or a Mod.

I disagree, I not want to be Mod on EN site, but I wrote some tutorials, and want in the future, if I feel that needed one.
If you check tutorial forum, you will find, that ordinary users, created useful tutorials, and no reason to limit them.

I not found so much postings on tutorials, that will force us to make such limitations.

[Villeroy]

I disagree,

+1

[Hagar Delest]

Postings in the Tutorial sections is very rare so it's no big deal to handle these few ones when they appear.